Why it matters for reading Scripture
Most people read a translation. Knowing how versions are made, from the Septuagint to modern English, explains why two Bibles read differently.
Biblical studiesWhat does the text say?
Bible translation is the carrying of the biblical text from Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek into another language, under stated principles, from a stated base text, by named people or bodies. Its study covers the ancient and modern versions, the theories that guide translators and who approves a translation. It asks how the text is carried, not what the original said.
Study v1.1, 23 October 2026
Most people read a translation. Knowing how versions are made, from the Septuagint to modern English, explains why two Bibles read differently.
Main modern versions translate from Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek editions, not a chain of translations; a full Bible exists in 795 of 7,393 languages (UBS, 1 January 2026).
Translators divide between formal and functional equivalence and on hard cases such as Isaiah 7:14 and gendered language; traditions divide on who authorises a version.
Keeps close to the form of the source.
The English Standard Version calls itself "essentially literal", seeking as far as possible to reproduce the precise wording of the original, and the NASB adheres to the principles of formal equivalence. Leland Ryken states the literary and theological case for this side; D. A. Carson answered that all translators must interpret sometimes.
Eugene Nida and Charles Taber defined translating as reproducing in the receptor language the closest natural equivalent of the source message, so that the receptors respond essentially as the original receptors did, through three stages: analysis, transfer and restructuring.
The Good News Bible was made by this method. Robert L. Thomas argued that its analysis stage covers the same ground as exegesis.
The Christian Standard Bible joins formal and functional equivalence and places itself in "a mediating position on the continuum of Bible translations".
The NRSV took the maxim "As literal as possible, as free as necessary", and the NIV's Committee on Bible Translation describes a balance of transparency to the original documents and comprehensibility for a broad audience. Such labels are publishers' self-descriptions, not terms of a single theory.
Moves the measure of a translation from the source text to the purpose it is meant to serve.
Skopos theory developed mainly from Hans Vermeer, with Katharina Reiss. Christiane Nord limits the rule by loyalty, the translator's responsibility to all her or his partners, and applied it to the New Testament with Klaus Berger.
Entered Bible translation through Ernst-August Gutt's work of 1991, drawing on the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson, which replaced the code model of communication with an inferential model.
Gutt's direct translation aims to preserve the linguistic properties of the original, while indirect translation conveys only the assumptions judged relevant. Stephen Pattemore warns that turning implicatures into explicit statements creates new and unintended ones.
Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig sought to reproduce the cadence of the Hebrew, dividing the text into breath-units and attending to the roots of words.
Ernst R. Wendland's literary functional equivalence attends to the artistic and literary dimension of Scripture, and Robert Alter argues that the Bible lives in English only by re-creating its literary virtuosity.
Under canon 825 books of Scripture may be published only with the approval of the Apostolic See or the conference of bishops, and any approved translation may be used for private prayer and study, with a stricter authority for the liturgy.
Liturgiam authenticam (2001) requires liturgical texts to be translated integrally and in the most exact manner, and Magnum Principium (2017) gives the episcopal conferences the task of preparing vernacular liturgical books after confirmation by the Apostolic See.
The Guidelines for Interconfessional Cooperation in Translating the Bible (1987), signed for the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity and the United Bible Societies, revise the Guiding Principles of 1968.
New Testament teams base their work on the United Bible Societies' critical Greek text, editions with a Catholic imprimatur include the deuterocanonical texts, and it is held wrong to assume that only one legitimate type of translation is needed.
The Constitution of Greece requires the prior sanction of the Church of Greece and the Ecumenical Patriarchate for an official translation of Scripture into any other form of language.
In Russia the Synodal Bible, complete in 1876, was made from the Masoretic Hebrew with the Greek and Slavonic taken into account. On 10 April 2012 the Romanian Patriarchate stated that a revised edition of Dumitru Cornilescu's Bible did not have the blessing of the Holy Synod.
Their own pages describe an ancient version held in honor and a lectionary in use, rather than a procedure for approving modern Bibles.
The Armenian Apostolic Church commemorates Sahak and Mesrop, who opened a school for translators after the alphabet of 404 or 405, in the Feast of the Holy Translators. The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church states that its version was made from the Septuagint, and a parish of the Assyrian Church of the East calls the Peshitta its official Bible.
Governance has run largely through voluntary societies: the British and Foreign Bible Society was founded in 1804 to distribute Scripture "without note or comment".
Most modern English versions are governed by a standing committee attached to a publisher or foundation; for the NIV, 70 percent of the committee must agree on each change. Denominations act by resolution, as when the Southern Baptist Convention in 2002 said it could not commend the TNIV.
Governs versions through measures and liturgical rules rather than by commissioning a Bible of its own.
The Prayer Book (Versions of the Bible) Measure 1965 permits versions authorized by the Convocations with the House of Laity, powers now exercised by the General Synod, while for Common Worship any version not prohibited by lawful authority may be used.
The rabbinic sources take more than one view.
The Talmud tells of 72 elders producing identical Greek translations for King Ptolemy, while Tractate Soferim calls that day as ominous for Israel as the day of the golden calf, since the Torah could not be accurately translated. Modern Jewish translation in English is governed by publishers, such as the Jewish Publication Society, ArtScroll and Koren, rather than by rabbinic courts.
The First Presidency stated in August 1992 that in doctrinal matters latter-day revelation supports the King James Version in preference to other English translations.
The Church presents selected portions of the Joseph Smith Translation, which it describes as more revelation than literal translation, and in 2009 issued a Spanish Bible based on the 1909 Reina-Valera text.
The New World Bible Translation Committee, formed in the 1940s, has chosen to remain anonymous, and the complete one-volume Bible appeared in 1961.
Its stated principles include restoring God's name to its rightful place in the Scriptures, translating literally where the target language allows, and conveying the correct sense where a literal rendering would distort or obscure the meaning.
The General Conference Ministerial Association's Elder's Digest reviewed Jack J. Blanco's The Clear Word in January 1995 as a paraphrase and commentary, not sufficiently reliable to teach doctrine and suitable for devotional use only.
An Adventist outreach site states that the church does not officially have a preferred translation.
Covers a range: a preference for the King James Version for its English or its tradition, a preference for the Received Text across languages, and a strong position that the KJV alone is the Word of God in English.
The Trinitarian Bible Society uses the Received Text without calling the Authorized Version inspired, the Dean Burgon Society defends the KJV as a true, faithful and accurate translation, and Peter Ruckman held that the English can correct the Greek.
The Pentateuch is probably first translated into Greek as a unit by a company of scholars in Alexandria. The founding account, the Letter of Aristeas, is judged by Britannica full of inaccuracies and the work of an Alexandrian Jew writing long after the events.52
Origen's Hexapla, made at Caesarea, sets the Hebrew, the Hebrew in Greek letters, Aquila, Symmachus, the Septuagint and Theodotion in parallel columns, the first surviving attempt to lay a literal, a free and a middle rendering side by side.53
After the Armenian alphabet is created, Sahak and Mesrop open a school for translators at Vagharshapat (Etchmiadzin) and begin translating the Bible into Armenian; until then it was available only in Greek and Syriac.28
The British and Foreign Bible Society is founded to distribute Scripture "without note or comment", a rule originally aimed at denominational partisanship.31
The Revised Version, a British and American revision of the 1611 text, publishes its New Testament in 1881 and its Old Testament in 1885.70
The first Afrikaans Bible is taken into use across South Africa on Sunday 27 August.71
On the United Bible Societies' count as of 1 January, a full Bible exists in 795 of 7,393 languages, and 3,272 languages have no Scripture.76
Identify the base text, the edition of the Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek from which the translation is made; the ESV, for example, names Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and the United Bible Societies' and Nestle-Aland Greek editions1.
Read the version's own preface, committee pages and publisher for its stated principles, treating labels such as "essentially literal" or "optimal equivalence" as self-descriptions rather than terms of a single theory18.
Establish who made and approved it: the committee and its charter, or the church body whose approval it carries3218.
Ask whether it was made from the original languages, from another translation, as the Douay-Rheims was from the Vulgate, or by revising an English predecessor, as the ESV took the 1971 RSV as its starting point771.
In making a translation, follow the checking sequence the agencies describe: successive drafts, a community check for clarity and naturalness, a back translation and a consultant check against the Hebrew and Greek7879.
Compare renderings passage by passage, since a stated source base does not by itself establish that every passage is accurately rendered.
Refer questions of original wording to textual criticism and of word meaning to the biblical languages, and record how translators rendered a word and the reasons they gave.
The works below shaped the field and are cited in this study, from the earliest to the most recent. Hover over a book, or select it, to see its author and the sources behind it.
Listed because this study draws on their published work; no association with or endorsement of Numa Verse is implied. Suggest a correction.
The words that carry the most weight in this field, each defined from the sources of this study. Turn a card over to read its definition.
The main modern versions do not descend through a chain of translations: their prefaces state that they translate from published Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek editions, and some also revise an English predecessor in the open1100. Some versions do rest on another translation, as the Douay-Rheims rests on the Vulgate and The Living Bible paraphrases the American Standard Version of 190177101. A mediated source establishes distance from the original, not corruption, and accuracy remains a question for each passage.
The positions grouped under that claim form a range, from a preference for the KJV or its Received Text to the claim that it alone is the Word of God in English48. The 1611 translators did not claim exclusive or inspired status: their preface holds that "variety of Translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the Scriptures", and the first edition printed alternative renderings in the margin6748. Most editions printed today descend from Benjamin Blayney's revision of 176948.
Individual renderings have carried a translator's theology, and the clearest cases are those where translators said so, as Luther did in defending allein at Romans 3:28102. The differences most often cited as removed doctrine, such as the "missing verses" and the Comma Johanneum, are differences of base text decided before translation103. Committee versions publish their texts and principles, and criticism of them comes from across the spectrum, from the Southern Baptist Convention on the 2011 NIV to Bart Ehrman on the NRSV104105.
On the United Bible Societies' count as of 1 January 2026, a full Bible exists in 795 of 7,393 languages, a New Testament in a further 1,815 and portions only in 1,511, while 3,272 have no Scripture76. The Wycliffe Global Alliance, on a snapshot of 1 August 2025, records translation in progress in 4,457 languages and 544 still waiting for work to begin88106.
Reviewed and approved by Duane Herholdt, BA (Theology), Chief Executive Officer, Numa Verse
Study version: v1.1, 23 October 2026 (theology map v1.27)
Last reviewed: 7 November 2026