Why it matters for reading Scripture
How a theme runs through the whole Bible in its own order, such as covenant, temple or kingdom. It joins single passages together.
Biblical studiesWhat does the text say?
Biblical theology is the study that traces themes and their relations across the canon in the Bible's own terms and order, such as covenant, kingdom and temple. It differs from exegesis, which reads a passage, book or corpus in its own setting, and from systematic theology, which arranges doctrine by topic. Its definition remains disputed.
Study v1.1, 23 October 2026
How a theme runs through the whole Bible in its own order, such as covenant, temple or kingdom. It joins single passages together.
Biblical theology has no agreed definition or single centre; twelve themes run from Genesis to Revelation and converge in Revelation 21 to 22.
Traditions divide on framing the story as covenants or dispensations or one running principle, and on Israel and the Church; scholars divide over supersessionism.
Frames the whole story as two covenants, of works and of grace, with Adam and Christ as the covenant heads.
The Westminster Confession holds one covenant of grace under different administrations in the two Testaments, while 1689 federalism holds that it was revealed by steps and formally concluded only in the new covenant. The tradition is divided on a future for ethnic Israel, and it holds that the moral law binds believers as a rule of life, though not as a covenant of works.
Frames the story as a succession of dispensations, stewardships that "are distinct and are not to be intermingled or confused".
Charles Ryrie named the distinction between Israel and the Church as its essence, and the Dallas Theological Seminary statement holds that the Church began at Pentecost and is distinct from Israel. Its end is premillennial, with Israel restored to her own land; the progressive form, named in 1991, works with a complementary hermeneutic and holds that Christ already reigns as Davidic king.
Takes the biblical covenants in canonical order as the "backbone" of the story and calls itself a mediating view, more aligned with covenant theology than with dispensationalism.
Peter J. Gentry and Stephen J. Wellum hold that Jesus and the new covenant must become the hermeneutical lens, and Israel's land is read typologically. New covenant theology, related but distinct, holds that the Mosaic covenant came to an end with Christ and that believers are under the law of Christ.
Reads all Scripture through the distinction between law and gospel, which runs through both Testaments rather than dividing them.
The law's chief office is to reveal sin, and the Formula of Concord names three uses of it. On Israel the churches differ: the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod calls the Church "Israel restored", while in Europe the Leuenberg Church Fellowship and the Synod of the Evangelical Church in Germany hold that the Church has not replaced Israel.
Frames the story as the one divine plan of salvation culminating in Christ: in Augustine's formula, God arranged that the New Testament be hidden in the Old and the Old be made manifest in the New.
Typology is the principal tool, and the four senses of Scripture rest on the literal. The Church understands itself as the new people of God, while the Catechism holds that the Old Covenant has never been revoked; the end is the Kingdom in its fullness, with new heavens and a new earth.
Reads the divine economy within the Church's Tradition, with Christ as beginning and end; for Georges Florovsky, one influential witness, fulfillment is the basic category of revelation.
The Old Testament is prophecy and type disclosed in the New, and the liturgy is where the Testaments are joined. Florovsky calls the Church the New Israel, but that reading is contested inside Orthodoxy, where Eugen Pentiuc urges revision of anti-Jewish hymns.
Frames the story as the way of salvation from sin to holiness, read by the analogy of faith that John Wesley described.
The Methodist Articles of Religion hold that the Old Testament is not contrary to the New, since in both everlasting life is offered by Christ. United Methodist resolutions hold that God's covenant with the Jewish people continues, and the church's page summarizes its position as rejecting supersessionism in all its forms. The article on the law that Wesley kept unaltered holds that the moral commandments still bind Christians.
Frames the story as the Spirit poured out, read from Pentecost and the "latter rain" of Joel 2:23, with the Full Gospel of salvation, sanctification, baptism in the Spirit, divine healing and the coming kingdom at its center.
Roger Stronstad treats Joel 2:28 as the turning point, at which the Spirit comes on the whole community rather than on certain individuals. The Assemblies of God, speaking for that denomination only, expect the salvation of national Israel during the millennium.
Frames the story as a great controversy between Christ and Satan over the character of God, his law and his sovereignty over the universe.
Its "Methods of Bible Study" affirms an overarching unity in the Bible from Genesis to Revelation and holds that "Israel represents the church" in New Testament application. The great principles of God's law are embodied in the Ten Commandments, the Sabbath is a memorial of creation, and the millennium is the reign of Christ with his saints in heaven.
Frames the story around Christ: the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective (1995) holds that Scripture as a whole has its center and fulfillment in him, and interpretations are tested in the faith community.
The Old Testament is read as promise to the forefathers and the New as the law of Christ that governs the Church. Mosaic provisions are read in the light of Christ, so that believers follow him in the way of peace.
Is a distinct enterprise, not a Jewish branch of Christian biblical theology.
Jon D. Levenson argued that biblical theology as Christians built it is inherently Christian, while Isaac Kalimi and Marvin Sweeney held a Jewish biblical theology possible, Sweeney reading the Tanakh in its own tripartite structure. The Hebrew Bible functions in Judaism through Talmud and Midrash, and a Tanakh that closes with Chronicles ends on return to the land and the Temple.
Georg Lorenz Bauer's Theologie des alten Testaments, published anonymously, is called the first theology of the Old Testament. With his Biblische Theologie des Neuen Testaments (1800 to 1802) the single discipline becomes two Testament theologies, a division that holds for most of the following two centuries.51494547
Geerhardus Vos gives his inaugural address as Professor of Biblical Theology at Princeton on 8 May, defining the discipline as "the exhibition of the organic progress of supernatural revelation".53
Krister Stendahl's article in the Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible distinguishes "What did it mean?" from "What does it mean?" and assigns biblical theology to the first question only.62
Read each text first in its own setting: Gabler held each author's ideas to "its own era, its own testament, its own place of origin, and its own genius"50.
Collect and compare the ideas of the biblical authors among themselves before any of them is put to dogmatic use5075.
Choose a theme and fix its key Hebrew and Greek terms and its first and last lexical markers, remembering that a theme can be present before its key word appears and continue after the word stops7677.
Follow the theme as it is introduced, developed, interrupted and resolved across the Torah, the Prophets, the Writings, the Gospels, Acts, the Epistles and Revelation.
State the order followed, since the order of the events narrated, of the traditions, of composition and of the books in a given canon do not coincide, and the canons differ in order and extent78.
Test proposed echoes of the Old Testament in the New against criteria such as Richard B. Hays's seven: availability, volume, recurrence, thematic coherence, historical plausibility, history of interpretation and satisfaction7980.
Record where the readings of the traditions divide, and give each reading in its own terms.
Keep the synthesis from flattening the canon: every single theme so far proposed as a center fails to cover some books8145.
The works below shaped the field and are cited in this study, from the earliest to the most recent. Hover over a book, or select it, to see its author and the sources behind it.
Listed because this study draws on their published work; no association with or endorsement of Numa Verse is implied. Suggest a correction.
The words that carry the most weight in this field, each defined from the sources of this study. Turn a card over to read its definition.
Exegesis reads a passage, book or corpus in its own setting, biblical theology traces themes and their relations across the canon, and systematic theology arranges doctrine by topic. Geerhardus Vos put it in an image: "Systematic Theology endeavors to construct a circle, Biblical Theology seeks to reproduce a line"53. Gabler's rule, as WiBiLex summarizes it, is that dogmatics must depend on exegesis, and not exegesis on dogmatics124.
Covenant, communion with God, promise, kingdom, and God's glory in salvation through judgment each have defenders, and each has been faulted for flattening the Bible's diversity73. Gerhard von Rad, Brevard Childs and Walter Brueggemann named no center, and Gerhard Hasel named God as the center while rejecting any concept as the principle of arrangement12573126.
The claim goes back to Marcion, whose break with Rome is dated to 144, and has been answered since Irenaeus, who wrote that "one and the same householder produced both covenants"127128. The traditions affirm one God across both Testaments, though how to read the violent texts remains contested129123130131.
It contains parallel accounts that differ in detail and order, and a theological diversity that scholars across the spectrum acknowledge132133134. Catholic teaching treats this through literary form, evangelical inerrantists through harmonization with an acknowledged residue, and rabbinic practice through a third passage that reconciles two17132135.
The Christian traditions affirm the Old Testament as Scripture and reject the view that the New voids the Old, while holding that some of its provisions no longer bind Christians in the same way; they differ on where to draw the line1291136. For Judaism the Hebrew Bible is complete in itself, and the Pontifical Biblical Commission holds that the Jewish reading is a possible one8374.
Reviewed and approved by Duane Herholdt, BA (Theology), Chief Executive Officer, Numa Verse
Study version: v1.1, 23 October 2026 (theology map v1.27)
Last reviewed: 7 November 2026